I changed to
objRpt.SetParameterValue("deliverynote",deliverynote)
I still doesn't work
I changed to
objRpt.SetParameterValue("deliverynote",deliverynote)
I still doesn't work
I know!.. this is very strange and I don't understand it. Hope someone can give me any light. I'm thinking someone knows the cause of this.
Un empleado se dio de baja por fallecimiento. Y tenia una incapacidad que inicia el 06.04.2016 hasta el 15.06.2016. Se le dio de baja el dia que fallecio el 23.04.2016., entonces se delimito el registro de incapacidad en infotipo 2001 colocandole como fecha de finalizacion 23.04.2016. En la segunda quincena de abril solo deberia calcularme 8 dias y me considera quince dias. Cual podria ser el error?
Hi Mahahir,
1) To address the issue with BAPI_ISUPROFILE_IMPORT, here are a few questions you will need to ask yourself:
- Are you passing the data in using the BAPI is one large call or are you breaking up the data into smaller packets? In previous implementations I have worked on, this is the typical way to ease performance issues by using parallelisation.
- How much data are you trying to load (i.e. 1 day of 15 minute data for 100 profiles = 9600 individual values)?
- What other jobs/programs are running at the same time? Are there semaphores applied to any processes when checking SM50?
- Have you checked the performance/configuration of the system with your BASIS team? Especially using ST02, DBACOCKPIT etc...
2) To address the issue with using AMI Enterprise Services:
- AMI web services are a change in technology, not a performance booster. Typically these are used when communication with an external system has the capability of communicating using web service calls directly from system to system using XML.
- AMI can offer customer enhancements up front when the data is received (i.e. extra validations) before EDM even touches the data. Its a nice touch when performing some validations up front.
- If your system does not have the appropriate resources (i.e. cores, RAM etc), then as Christian has stated, this is probably not a good idea to try this out.
Regards
Zane
You should work with your DB2 DBA and your AIX admin to reduce the usage of filesystem cache. Your maxperm is set to 90% (of 110 Gb). That's way too high. Is PO the only application running on that LPAR? Because 110 Gb seems quite large for a single LPAR.
Use concurrent I/O to improve DB2 database performance
Message was edited by: Stephen Ferracioli
You can see that in web service monitor. You can find that in Administration section.
Hi Andreas,
can you help me in the below post?
Calculating running count based on conditions in WEBi
Thanks in advance
that is interesting.
APO opening date is calculated using GR Time, GI Time, Transp Lane Duration, and Opening Period so obviously won't match the Pur Info Record planned delivery time.
So you are saying if you have a Transp Duration of 30 days and the pur info rec has a planned delivery time of only 2 days. the ECC Pur Req Release date will use the pur info rec planned delivery time of 2 days and so will be totally different from the APO opening date?
I have not seen that.
We are NOT talking the ECC request date. You are talking about ECC Release Date EBAN-FRGDT.
Ken
Hi Samuli,
Thank you for your quick response.
I'll take a look at these notes and let you know how it goes.
Cheers,
Laura
Hi Sakti,
Requirements type is used in the tcodes: OPPS (after is used in the OPPT)
Strategy group is used in the material master (view MRP3) or MRP Group (OPPR) view MRP1
Strategy group contains planning strategy that is used in MD61
You need to check the group of strategy / strategy of the materials of your material group
Regards
Dimas Faria
Hi Vassilis,
Have you tried it ?
If the docentry is the same, the select statement will return you the error whenever there is an U_Status = 'Approved' regardless of whichever line it is.
So long as there is an 'Approved' status on any line.
or.. Am I missing what you need ?
Regards
Edy
debug.....
Hi,
Currently, Audit policies have been enabled in HANA to record the actions performed by the user.
I would like to change the Audit trail target from 'SYSLOG'(default) to 'Database Table' so that the audit information can be recorded in 'AUDIT_LOG' view and on top of this view, a report is to be built to analyze who did what and when.
Here are the doubts I have:
What would be the impact if I do this change - SYSLOG to DATABASE TABLE?
Do I need to create the existing policies again?
Can we track the User activities of a Web application that is built on HANA?
Can someone help me on this. Thanks!
-- KRPK
Hello Fong,
Long time! how are you? Convey my regards to Carolyn and Margie
So coming to your question, there should be a job in IDM similar to below.
Disable all the passes and enable only printer related passes and run the job. It should read all the printers set up in ECC and load it into IDM.
Kind regards,
Jai
Its good that your issue is resolved and you figure out that it was the issue with class node class.
If I have been at you place i could have corrected the class settings for class 200 instead of using class 300 assigned to non configurable materials.
To know the in detail setup on how to use classes in BOM as component, please go though below document. Also please rate the document if you like it and find it useful .
Classes as place holders [Components in Super BOM]
Hope you will find my reply appropriate even though you have close the thread.
Thanks
Ritesh
Dear Tania,
I can't find Infotype 3743.
yes .. I do not know why the SYSTEM user cannot revoke the authorization either.
I do know that if a developer user, call it user A, creates a role, then the SYSTEM cannot assign/revoke that role. user A has to do that. I think it is a better approach to create the roles/user by the SYSTEM user as this user will always be there. Unlike the userA this user may be deleted later, as you mentioned, it may cause negative effects. I am not 100% sure of the reason, but I am sure if you look at the master guide or even on the security guide, there may be an explanation.
any other person experiencing this? please share your thoughts.
Hi,
I'm trying to post a manual journal entry with product category against a GL account.
Is there any way to adjust the screen variant?
Or any suggestions?
Thanks
Lynni
Hi Roland;
Yes, all the recent Appeon releases are all tested & certified for W10. I have been on W10 since July 2015 on my laptop & September 2015 on my desktop and Appeon has worked flawlessly for me on both machines.
1) What release & bitness of Appeon are you running?
2) Are you on the .Net or Java version of Appeon?
3) What version(s) of PB are you using?
4) What version & bitness of SqlAnyWhere are you using?
Regards ... Chris