I hope you have to add Xref3 field At miro then only the field will be filled in bseg.
I found the below post .
I hope you have to add Xref3 field At miro then only the field will be filled in bseg.
I found the below post .
Hello,
Please refer SAP help document on order selection on combine order,
SAP Mill Products - SAP Library
The planning unit of measure must be the same as the base unit of measure.
The original orders must have the same production plant.
The standard selection procedure consists of the following steps:
Also check the selection profile in SPRO - Production -> Shop floor control -> Master data - >Order -> Administer selection profile for the combination.
Please refer these documents,
Combining Production and Process Orders with Batch Production
Combined Production Order Processing (DIMP)
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar
1. Yes, I created on PO against this order already during checking.
2. I checked the condition type PB00, (attached the screen shot of the m/06 setting). (even now the net price in PO is appearing in editable mode)
3. Since contract was made in Ref Pur Org, release order to be processed by the normal Pur Org, that is the reason why I changed the P Org.
pl guide
regards
Hey Experts,
Currently I'm using IDES ECC 6.0 with EhP7.
Where i have standard BAPI errors. Below are the BAPI errors i found so far.
BAPI_ADDRESSPERS_SAVEREPLICA
BAPI_ADDRESSPERS_CHANGE
BAPI_ADDRESSPERS_GETDETAIL
BAPI_ADDRESSORG_SAVEREPLICA
BAPI_ADDRESSORG_CHANGE
BAPI_ADDRESSORG_GETDETAIL
The reason for the error is a field name called BLOCK_FIELD which is not declared in type group . But has been used in the above BAPIs.
Because of these BAPI the vendor block, unblock and vendor change in standard SAP is giving dump.
Hi Mohammad,
I have gone through table DBTABLOG, it has Unique identification of an entry in DBTABLOG, Table Name, and other informations.
But i need the change log datas. For example, if i want change log data of MARV table, it should give me the changes made in that table for that particular date range.
Is it possible using table DBTABLOG.
8083 is the port for accessing SMP Admin cockpit (also for OData services exposed via Integration gateway).
Endpoint url should point to backend system and in HTTP/HTTPS configuration, you have to point that url to backend system only.
Are you trying it on SMP 3.0 or 2.3? Please share screenshots of errors.
Regards,
JK
Hi
I'm hoping this is simple, but for hours of trying and searching I'm guessing it mightn't be.
I'm trying to get a qualification that is imparted to a profile via an appraisal to reflect the validity periods set in the appraisal template - in this case for a driver's licence. There is no validity period on the qualification due to variations between states, and also the choice to pay for a 5 year licence or a 10 year licence.
I have tried all the options under the follow-up processing and can get the start date to stick but not the end date - no validity period, so 31.12.9999 ends up being the end date, as shown below.
Thanks for any assistance you may be able to offer
Pat
Hi,
I am working on Implementation project in Finland.
Need guidance on EVL Configuration, if anyone can provide.
I need configuration document & user manual for this. If someone can provide, how to proceed for this, would be helpful for me.
Regards,
Hitesh
dear all,
i have attached smartform in nace with required output type with application v1 sales.
problem is in va02 transaction one sales order print out put i mean in invoice price is coming with addition of
tax and actual unit price but they need actual cost and vat and tax come seperately and at last need final value.
i copied standard smartform from BA00 : YBIN_SDORC and created like YBIN_SDORC_5000 only i have changed
logo and header text.
other sales order in va02 if i want the value coming corectly how they want. but in one sales order they created new pricing control type like
ZINT&S Pricing proce Trade & S EK01 Actual Costs. they also need this pricing control they asked me to devlop new logic. but mhow do i do can you guide me little.
but if i replace this ZINT&S this with this ZINSER the op is coming how they want. so in std code how do i do with this new pricing so that value will come exaclty they want this both condition.
thanks & regads,
kaushik.
Yes I agree but not able to understand below lines ,
We need to increase the Credit exposure when the Sales order is raised with the Payment term 0001,
( Does this means if payment terms -0001 - customer has X credit limit , and if Payment terms 000X- then customer has Y credit limit .
But we need to override the Credit limit check since it is a Cash Sale.
If I understood correctly system should not check the credit limit in this case if the payment terms 0000X ?
Regards
Santosh
Hi Deepak,
Thanks for your reply.
I have checked SPRO settings-Transactions-settings for activities-assign categories to transaction types. but here only they maintained all drop down 5 values.
In coding idid the changes as below..in debugging mode the values showing it_selection_table = li_result1 ). li_result1 tab like as below screen shot.but why it is still showing default value ZAP in webui.??
READ TABLE lt_ddlb INTO ls_ddlb WITH KEY key = ' '.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
DELETE lt_ddlb INDEX sy-tabix.
DELETE lt_ddlb WHERE key = ' '.
APPEND ls_ddlb to li_result1.
* INSERT INITIAL LINE INTO lt_ddlb index sy-tabix.
APPEND LINES OF lt_ddlb TO li_result1.
ENDIF.
IF NOT gr_ddlb_category IS BOUND.
CREATE OBJECT gr_ddlb_category
EXPORTING
iv_source_type = 'T'.
ENDIF.
gr_ddlb_category->set_selection_table( it_selection_table = li_result1 ).
rv_valuehelp_descriptor = gr_ddlb_category.
ENDCASE.
ZAP
Thanks & Regards
Kalpana
Hi Atif,
No need to create a separate dep.area for revaluation. Once you do revaluation posting, the system will post the entry to depreciation exp and dep.reserve. Based on base method 03 maintained in multi level method, the system will consider revaluations also.
Regards,
Mukthar
Hi Ursula,
Thanks for reply.
I have also opened incident with SAP and following on that.
I am on BW7.4 SP14 and BPC 10.1 SP010.
Regards,
Sarvesh
Hi All,
Any comments please
Madhu M,
Thanks for your understanding- Helpful answer. No report or transaction is affected. I was just trying to find some rational explanation to convince the client.
Thanks a lot.
You're welcome Patrick! Thanks for sharing the screenshot.
Hello Soumick,
It is SAP standard functionality, system will allow to create the excise invoices with out excise duties.
The possibilities of controlling this is have separate billing document type (Commercial billing) for these kind of transactions and don't assign this billing doc in CIN settings. Then system will not allow to create the excise invoice in J1IIN.
Option 2: Through the user exit check in J1ID - Material and chapter I.D combination if is not maintained then don't allow to create a excise invoice.
J_1I7_USEREXIT_EXCISE_BEF_SAVE.
Regards,
S.Himavanth.
It is a standard functionality and don't go with any enhancement as already suggested. For one delivery / billing document, you need to have one excise invoice and it is nothing wrong if non-excisable items are included. Anyway, duty value will not be considered for that. In fact, from statutory point of view, you are suppose to record all out going materials even if it is non-excisable.
G. Lakshmipathi
Try below BADIs.
ME_REQ_POSTED
ME_REQ_HEADER_TEXT
ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST
below BADI before save for the ME51n transaction..
ME_PROCESS_PO
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
ME_PROCESS_REQ
ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST
and use can also try user exits; User exit or BADI for Tcode ME51N | SCN
Hope this helps.